|
Post by marick on Apr 4, 2007 23:54:33 GMT -5
it's not easy to make a top ten list... but how about making a classification that all would agree. there will b 3 groups of players... 1.players(the noobs) 2.warriors(good players) 3.gods(the best players) each category can make his own top ten. this classification must b accepted by the most of members of the forum. this means that all the top ten lists made till now must have the players included in the 3rd group of players: the "gods". also i'll ask dio if he could put a new sign near the star above the name, each sign will represent on of the 3 groups. at the end there will b made a huge list with 3 groups with all players in it, and where the order wont count(the order counts only in top ten list of best players of each group.) till the list is made, waiting for opinions and suggestions...
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Apr 5, 2007 0:34:41 GMT -5
I don't think dio will go for it, you can make your list here. Just say that it can be changed and that this is not your personal list but a general list on who is good.
|
|
|
Post by marick on Apr 5, 2007 1:39:03 GMT -5
ok, it can be changed and this is not my personal list but a general list on who is good. it will be made by the players, they will vote and come with suggestions, it will include as more players as possible... if someone doesn't understand something, plz say, i'll try to explain...
|
|
|
Post by Paragon on Apr 7, 2007 12:51:23 GMT -5
Where do we vote?
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Apr 11, 2007 18:51:26 GMT -5
Well, we need a list, that is something the members need to help with. Post who you think should be on this, remember have people we all know. The list will then be made into a pole with the three votes, players, wariors, and gods.
Who should be on this list?
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Apr 12, 2007 18:26:15 GMT -5
since not alot of people are posting I'll be the first.
*anti bbb berserk ccc cthulhu cyan ddd *dio *dominion *hawk hawk me2 noodle paragon *ocp salsa *thom *abyss *Stipa *ceasar *general *kingsuck/isuck *ISUCK/therealisuck *wolfgirl *asmodis
* are people who bought the game, discount players that are imposters.
|
|
ddd
Usergroup Leader
Founder of NLD Alliance
Posts: 106
|
Post by ddd on Apr 14, 2007 7:10:05 GMT -5
Its good to see bbb,ccc and ddd. But dont forget zzz. He doesnt play often but is same good as bbb I said zzz not ZzZ
|
|
|
Post by marick on Apr 14, 2007 7:48:54 GMT -5
you should have 4 groups with: demi-gods and gods the idea with one more group is not that bad, we would have to much gods with 3 groups only... so i agree, but we should find another name for the third group, a name that has no "god" word in it, something between warrior and god... waiting for suggestions...
|
|
|
Post by dominion on Apr 14, 2007 8:23:27 GMT -5
THE GROUP KNOWN AS HURCULES !
{{ A MAN/GOD! }}
|
|
ddd
Usergroup Leader
Founder of NLD Alliance
Posts: 106
|
Post by ddd on Apr 14, 2007 8:52:35 GMT -5
Legendary? Dutchmen
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Apr 14, 2007 9:40:12 GMT -5
How about legendary, or fanatic?
|
|
ddd
Usergroup Leader
Founder of NLD Alliance
Posts: 106
|
Post by ddd on Apr 14, 2007 10:36:58 GMT -5
How about legendary, or fanatic? - Legendary - Lords - Dukes - Kings - Masters - Knights - Kaisers - Rex - Generals Here we go
|
|
|
Post by marick on Apr 15, 2007 5:49:33 GMT -5
well...... to much players have the word "king" in their names.... lord, duke.. i don't like it... knight is too close to warrior... general.... there is one..lol... more would be too much lol ;D but i really like hero.. the group of HEROES!!! what about that? only a hero could manage a god.. if nobody against this, here are the groups: 1. players(noobs) 2. warriors(good players) 3. heroes(very good players) 4. gods(the best players) ;)what about that??
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Apr 15, 2007 13:59:08 GMT -5
how about novice?
If novice is accepted it will be as follows
noob novice warrior hero god
|
|
|
Post by marick on Apr 17, 2007 1:27:42 GMT -5
and a final group for players between Warrior and Noob. i don't think we need that, the new players wont b on that list, they probably wont request that or other peeps wont vote them... i guess this first group(players) is the one between the new players and warriors, kinda peeps with perspective.. we r interested in them, the future warriors and active members of this forum( ;)rob).
|
|
matt
Junior Moderator
Posts: 186
|
Post by matt on Apr 21, 2007 18:02:34 GMT -5
how about chieftain and supreme chansolers thats what we have on the real leauge of partraticanship (what ever you speel it)
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Apr 22, 2007 16:30:01 GMT -5
tsuda must you tell people about the club we are startin at school?
|
|
matt
Junior Moderator
Posts: 186
|
Post by matt on Apr 22, 2007 18:21:36 GMT -5
i mean what club?
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Apr 22, 2007 20:06:47 GMT -5
good.
marick i like the classifications if we have a concenius you or i can make a poll.
|
|
matt
Junior Moderator
Posts: 186
|
Post by matt on Apr 25, 2007 0:40:13 GMT -5
i still like supreme chansollers
|
|
|
Post by patocp on Apr 25, 2007 10:29:55 GMT -5
but but, there can only be one supreme chancellor lol.
|
|
matt
Junior Moderator
Posts: 186
|
Post by matt on Apr 25, 2007 19:04:42 GMT -5
that where the prefix co comes in
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Apr 27, 2007 12:15:35 GMT -5
tsuda don't be dumb. everyone tsuda and i are starting a paddleball club or our school. it not serios at all so we have a pimp ass titles and just dumb shit. I really have no idea why he is telling you this shit.
Fuck the supreme chancelors sor ranking only for the club k tsuda.
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Apr 29, 2007 20:51:10 GMT -5
i think everyone has to be included, after all everyone is subject to unofficial ranking.
|
|
|
Post by marick on May 9, 2007 14:08:57 GMT -5
more :(i said MORE!!!
|
|
|
Post by patocp on May 9, 2007 16:40:47 GMT -5
wouldnt it be better if he could sumhow see who voted? then we could use the classfication as a way to improve. for example, i vote rob as a noob player. rob has no idea who did it. but if we can click and see which ppl voted for what, then rob could go and kick my ass and force me to change my vote
|
|
|
Post by marick on May 9, 2007 16:57:56 GMT -5
i want honesty in voting
|
|
|
Post by Rob on May 9, 2007 18:06:52 GMT -5
only staff can see the voters. But i see what you're saying ocp. I don't know if that can be done I'll go and check.
|
|
|
Post by Rob on May 9, 2007 19:40:07 GMT -5
alright well i was thinking maybe the most votes wins but thats better i guess.
|
|
|
Post by Rob on May 9, 2007 19:47:35 GMT -5
well now that i think about it i don't like that way of calculating.
Lets say I think name is a warrior but other think he is a hero, then most likely he'll be a hero.
I think there should be two types of vote. one popular the other the average. and the popular would be the one that counts.
|
|